On February 5, 2018, the federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled that increasing Under Insured Motorist (UIM) benefits counts as a new purchase of insurance coverage. Therefore, automobile insurance carriers must obtain a new waiver of stacked benefits under the auto insurance policy.
Stacked Benefits in UIM Coverage
Stacked benefits in UIM coverage mean that a person who buys automobile insurance for more than one vehicle under the same policy can choose to purchase up to double the UIM insurance coverage. The Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) requires insurance carriers to offer stacked benefits to every policyholder who buys insurance. If the policyholder decides not to take advantage of the stacked benefits, the insurer must obtain a written waiver of those benefits.
Example of Stacked Benefits
If you insure two cars for $20,000 each, you are eligible for stacking benefits that allow you to claim up to $40,000 on each vehicle. The MVFRL requires the insurer to offer this option to every insured. If the insured declines, the insurer must obtain an express written waiver of the option to purchase stacked benefits.
Court Case: Barnard v Travelers
According to the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court in Barnard v Travelers, No. 17-00290, whenever an insured chooses to increase the amount of coverage under their UIM policy, the insurance carrier must obtain a new written waiver of stacked benefits as required by the MVFRL.
Background of the Case
Michelle Barnard, the Plaintiff, held a UIM policy with The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, the Defendant, since 2007. When she initially secured the policy, she had UIM coverage limits of $50,000 for each of her two vehicles 6. At the time of purchasing the initial insurance coverage, she signed a written waiver of stacked benefits under that policy, waiving her right to stack UIM benefits under her policy. With that, the maximum amount of UIM benefits she could claim under her policy was $50,000.
In May 2009, Ms. Barnard increased her third-party liability coverage limits under the policy from $50,000 to $100,000 on each insured vehicle. This meant she would have been entitled to claim up to $200,000 on each car, as per her allowable stacked benefits. Notably, Ms. Barnard did not sign any written waiver of her stacked benefits upon this increase in coverage.
When Ms. Barnard was injured in a car accident on June 17, 2016, she submitted a UIM claim under her policy with Travelers Insurance. Travelers tendered $100,000 in UIM benefits to Ms. Barnard, assuming she had waived her option to stack her UIM benefits in 2007. Ms. Barnard rejected this tender and sued Travelers, claiming she was entitled to more than was tendered.
Increase in UIM Limit is a “Purchase”
Travelers argued before the Eastern District Court that it had no duty to obtain a new waiver of stacked benefits under the policy, even after Ms. Barnard increased her liability insurance coverage limits in 2009. Travelers claimed the initial 2007 waiver was still in operation and effective, despite the increased coverage purchased by Ms. Barnard in 2009.
The federal district court rejected Travelers’ argument. Judge Gerald McHugh held that the language of the MVFRL requires a renewed waiver of stacked benefits when liability coverage limits are increased or purchased. According to Judge McHugh, because an increase in coverage under an existing policy requires an insured to pay a higher premium, an increase in coverage limits qualifies as a “purchase” as defined by the MVFRL. As a result, the court ruled that Travelers should have obtained a new waiver of UIM stacked benefits in 2009 when Ms. Barnard increased her liability insurance limits. Pursuant to the district court’s ruling, Travelers was responsible for paying Ms. Barnard up to $200,000 in UIM benefits under her policy.
For questions relating to the MVFRL and Pennsylvania auto insurance coverages, please contact Matthew R. Zwick, partner of Zwick Law, at (814) 371-6400 or by e-mail, to schedule a legal consultation. At Zwick Law, we’re always here for you
*The use of the Internet, Facebook and/or any other form of social media communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Time-sensitive information should be directed immediately to the office of Zwick Law at (814) 371-6400.